Stress tests may be poor guide to capital levels – BIS paper

Risk modelling

Using stress-test results to set capital requirements may be counterproductive in some circumstances, research published by the Bank for International Settlements finds.

Authors Tirupam Goel and Isha Agarwal note earlier literature has found empirical evidence that stress tests are “noisy” and therefore may give regulators “imprecise signals” on bank resilience. They develop a theoretical framework to explore the implications of this noise.

In the model, regulators use the signals they receive

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: