Podcast: the legal implications of CBDC

The majority of central banks cannot issue CBDCs to the public under current frameworks
IMF logo
Photo: Flickr/freeimage4life

Very few central banks have the appropriate legal frameworks in place to allow them to launch central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to members of the public.

In Central Banking’s latest Tech Talk podcast episode, Arthur Rossi and Akihiro Yoshinaga from the International Monetary Fund’s legal team discuss the legal foundations of CBDC under central bank and monetary law.

“The introduction of CBDC raises many important legal questions,” says Yoshinaga. “These questions have practical implications as CBDCs will need to have sound legal foundations in order to be accepted by the public.”

From a legal perspective, design has an important role to play. Account-based CBDC is similar to current digital forms of money used within interbank payment systems, whereby participant firms have accounts with central banks.

“Its legal features are well designed and understood,” Yoshinaga says. “Token-based CBDC is the one which raises numerous legal implications.”

As part of their research, Yoshinaga, Rossi and their colleagues analysed the frameworks of 174 central banks to see whether they would allow for the issuance of CBDCs.

Their findings, which were published at the end of 2020, concluded most central banks (69%) cannot issue a tokenised version of CBDC. For a further 16% it was not clear whether their legal frameworks would allow such a design.

Similarly, although most central banks have legal frameworks to allow firms to open accounts, only 6% have the legal backing to issue a general-purpose account-based CBDC, where consumers would be able to open an account directly with the central bank, Rossi explains. 

Rossi says central bank law issues can be solved through relatively straightforward legal reforms; monetary law issues, however, pose a more fundamental legal challenge.

From a monetary law perspective, it is not evident CBDCs can be granted “currency” status.

But Yoshinaga and Rossi argue it is not necessary for CBDCs to be deemed currency – after all, central bank ‘book money’ is arguably the most used within the financial system and is not legally defined as currency or legal tender.

Index

00:00 Introduction

01:46 Legal risks of CBDCs

04:20 Design importance

06:45 Impediments with current legal frameworks

09:10 Changes needed to legalise CBDC issuance

11:02 The importance of monetary law

12:50 Is legal tender status necessary?

14:30 Challenges associated with changes to monetary law

16:15 Does the definition of money need to change?

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: