Supervisory lessons: fault lines in prudential regulation
Practically all regulators worldwide now seem focused on regulatory capital, an obvious supervisory approach. However, asset evaluation and provisions for arrears and impairments are only weakly regulated in most countries. Proper income recognition of accruals may not even be regulated. As a result, regulatory capital per book, however defined, often proves ineffective and is, in any case, not necessarily real capital.
It is important to remember that cosmetic practices will take hold in
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Initiative of the year: the Netherlands Bank’s ChatDNB
- Central Banking Awards 2024: fourth round announced
- Central bank of the year: Central Bank of Brazil