RBA paper modifies DGSE to include housing sector
Model does better job of explaining data on Australian economy, researchers say
A discussion paper published by the Reserve Bank of Australia proposes a new method of modelling the housing sector in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model.
In DSGE Reno: adding a housing block to a small open economy model, Christopher G Gibbs, Jonathan Hambur and Gabriela Nodari present large-scale open economy DGSE model with four intermediate sectors. These are non-traded, housing, traded and resources.
In the model, “households are assumed to consume housing services as part of
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Supervisors grapple with the smaller bank dilemma
- Central bank of the year: Central Bank of Brazil
- Fed policy-makers disagree over risks