Skip to main content

PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves

Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption

Two tango dancers with a merging of US and UK flags as a background
Credit: Risk.net montage

As US regulators change their tune on the details of globally agreed standards for trading book capital, the UK’s Prudential Regulatory Authority has tried to dance along. But sometimes they find themselves out of step.

Practitioners have noticed when the PRA misses a beat, and are now fretting that the differences will hand US banks a capital advantage.

“The PRA has done a good job aligning mostly with the US,” says Gregg Jones, a director in the International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: www.centralbanking.com/subscriptions

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.