Akerlof warns economics is biased against methods seen as ‘soft’

data screen
Methods that eschew data analysis are being neglected, Akerlof says

Nobel prize-winning economist George Akerlof warns economists are committing “sins of omission” due to their bias against methods seen as “soft”.

In a forthcoming paper in the Journal of Economic Literature, Akerlof says it has been common to classify subjects on a scale from “hard” to “soft”, with physics at the hard end and history at the soft. Within economics, quantitative methods are seen as harder than qualitative, with causal identification viewed as particularly hard, says Akerlof.


Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: