Should banks hold cocos or other kinds of buffers?

Richard Heckinger examines the merits of contingent convertible bonds

At a recent conference on international banking1, a question was posed to an expert panel – which included regulators – as to whether regulators prefer buffers or contingent convertible bonds (cocos) to satisfy capital requirements. The short answer, without much further discussion, was buffers, because they are more flexible. Of course, the comparison between cocos and buffers is specious, because the former are a type of security and the latter are a balance sheet distinction that can be

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account