Dual reporting requirements in Asia cause concern
The concept of dual reporting – where both counterparties to a trade are responsible for reporting it to a trade repository under new regulations – has been causing a headache for market participants in Europe and is likely to be equally challenging in parts of Asia, where dual reporting is also expected to be required.
Trade reporting came into effect in the US earlier this year, but the Dodd-Frank Act, unlike the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (Emir), requires only a single
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Central Banking Awards 2024: fourth round announced
- Initiative of the year: the Netherlands Bank’s ChatDNB
- Payments and market infrastructure development: Federal Reserve Systems’ FedNow