Skip to main content

Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?

Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor

Susan Collins and the Fed Reserve system
Risk.net montage/Orjan Ellingvag/Alamy

New proposals from the US prudential agencies can still comply with the 2010 Collins Amendment, according to legal experts, even though the longstanding capital floor that carries the senator’s name is set to be expunged from the rulebook. But sources think regulators may need to issue a more explicit explanation to keep lawmakers onside.

“There’s enough flexibility with respect to the Collins Amendment and its specific statutory language for the agencies to implement those statutory requirements

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: www.centralbanking.com/subscriptions

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.