Skip to main content

Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?

Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules

A red ‘maga-style’ baseball cap has the letters IMA written on it
Credit: Risk.net montage

Before the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its final iteration of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) in 2019, the use of internal models for calculating trading risks was flourishing – across the globe, most banks modelled their trading books under the internal models approach, or IMA. 

Competitive considerations led banks to seek the advantages of lower capital requirements associated with its use. But the closer the FRTB start date has loomed, the larger the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: www.centralbanking.com/subscriptions

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.