Fed study mulls whether to count tokenised assets as M1 or M2
Emergence of new money causes headaches for monetary aggregates, economists say
Stablecoins used for payments may be classified as M1 if they gain popularity, but will only be counted as M2 if they fail to gain traction, a study by economists at the US Federal Reserve has argued.
In their Feds note published on September 4, Kristen Payne and Mary-Frances Styczynski examine tokenised deposits, tokenised money market funds (MMFs) and stablecoins against two conventional definitions of the monetary base.
M1 refers to the “narrowest and most liquid measure of the money supply”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: www.centralbanking.com/subscriptions
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com