FSB-Iosco tweaks systemic shadow bank definition after criticism
Methodology for asset managers undergoes revamp
International standard setters have adjusted proposals for assessing the systemic importance of shadow banks, after initial plans came under fire last year.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and International Organization of Securities Commissions (Iosco) yesterday jointly released revised proposals for identifying globally systemic "non-bank non-insurance" (NBNI) firms, with the bulk of changes focused on rules for asset managers.
The overall structure of the methodology remains unchanged
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Bernanke calls for total redesign of BoE forecasting
- Taking stock of Bernanke: the original sin of forecasting
- Bank of England: time for fourth-generation forecasting tools?