Asean+3 safety net needs more firepower

Asia's efforts under the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM) to immunise its economies from liquidity freezes caused by the sharp outflow of foreign funds during times of market uncertainly are still falling short both in terms of size of funds available as well as the ability for countries in the region to take pre-emptive action.

In an article published in the February edition of the Central Banking Journal, Charles Adams,a visiting professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected].com to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: