Why has Brown ditched his prudence?

Gordon Brown's tenure as chancellor of the exchequer has seen two very different approaches to managing the public finances. From 1997 to 2002, Gordon Brown mark I was exceptionally prudent. For four years, public sector spending and investment, as a proportion of GDP, was actually lower than in the previous years of Conservative government - years when public spending had been heavily constrained. Indeed, many in the Labour Party complained that Brown had been "too prudent by half". But

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: