Capital controls less effective at curbing flows than macro-pru – BIS paper

The Bank for International Settlements, Basel
The Bank for International Settlements, Basel
Photo: Ulrich Roth

Macro-prudential policies are more effective at limiting cross-border capital flows than capital controls, research published by the Bank for International Settlements finds.

In the working paper, Jon Frost, Hiro Ito and René van Stralen conduct a two-stage empirical estimation. They seek to control for endogeneity that could result from countries being more likely to impose macro-prudential measures and capital controls during periods of high inflows. Their data spans 83 advanced and emerging

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: