Banking ‘deserts’ do not explain financial exclusion – NY Fed economists

Banking deserts: they do not necessarily have higher rates of unbanked people

The absence of nearby banks is not sufficient to explain why the proportion of “unbanked” people in the US is higher in some regions than in others, according to researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Donald Morgan, Maxim Pinkovskiy and Davy Perlman study US “banking deserts”, defined as neighbourhoods without bank branches or any within 10 miles of their centre. Mapping these areas shows their highest prevalence to be in actual deserts, such as parts of Nevada and Arizona, which

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: