BIS paper says liquidity regulation should not replace lender of last resort function

bis-centralbahnplatz-tower-2
The BIS tower in Basel

A central bank's lender of last resort (LOLR) function is best used to tackle a different kind of crisis than liquidity regulations and therefore one cannot replace the other, according to a working paper published on Friday by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

Why do we need both liquidity regulations and a lender of last resort? by Mark Carlson, Burcu Duygan-Bump and William Nelson studies the experience of the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis.

The authors argue the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: