Jackson Hole: economists flag costs and benefits of bloated balance sheets

Christopher Sims, Ricardo Reis and Jeremy Stein see pros and cons to big balance sheets

chris-sims-photo-by-alex-towle
Christopher Sims. Photo: Alex Towle

This year's Jackson Hole symposium brought together economists to discuss the future of monetary policy frameworks. A key question for many speakers was what impact large central bank balance sheets would have on the economy.

Christopher Sims of Princeton University, during a lunch address on August 26, analysed central bank balance sheets through a fiscal lens. He noted quantitative easing (QE) programmes at major central banks had led to balance sheets that are large enough to "generate public

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.