BIS: Top-down approach to countercyclical capital buffers preferred
A Bank for International Settlements paper published in July analyses two designs for countercyclical capital buffers and finds a top-down approach to capital controls is better than a bottom up one.
The objective of countercyclical prudential capital is to encourage banks to build up buffers in good times that can be drawn down in bad times. A major distinction for countercyclical capital schemes is whether conditioning variables are bank-specific (bottom-up) or systemwide (top-down).
The
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Trends in reserve management 2024: survey results
- People: RBI appoints senior officials
- China to start selling ultra-long term sovereign bonds