CPMI digs into data on correspondent banking pull-back
The landscape of correspondent banking is changing, but in a complex and uneven way, a study published today (July 13) by the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) finds.
The report unearths details of why many banks are reducing or abandoning their correspondent relationships, based on both a qualitative survey and data from the Swift network.
Correspondent banking is where one bank (the correspondent) holds deposits owned by other banks (the respondents) to provide payments
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Initiative of the year: the Netherlands Bank’s ChatDNB
- Central Banking Awards 2024: fourth round announced
- Central bank of the year: Central Bank of Brazil