Stress test revisions ‘an embarrassment’ for the Fed
Report released last week was reissued by the bank yesterday
The Federal Reserve yesterday issued a revised report on stress test results for 30 systemically important banks published last week after detecting “inconsistencies” in assumptions about banks’ dividend and compensation plans for the next two years.
The Fed alerted the public to its miscalculations on Friday, a day after the original results were published, issuing revised figures on banks’ common Tier I capital ratios under a scenario in which equity markets tumble 50% and US house prices drop
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Most read
- Bernanke calls for total redesign of BoE forecasting
- Taking stock of Bernanke: the original sin of forecasting
- Bank of England: time for fourth-generation forecasting tools?